Chinese family reportedly paid US$6.5 million to ‘fixer’ for admission into Stanford

  • Wall Street Journal and Los Angeles Times say the Beijing family has not been charged
  • The payment was made in the ‘Operation Varsity Blues’ college admissions case, which ensnared families, coaches and administrators across the US

 Daniel Bases

 

A Chinese family allegedly paid the mastermind of a college admissions cheating scheme US$6.5 million to assure their child’s admission to Stanford University, US news media reported on Wednesday.

The payment is thought to be the largest one made by parents who employed William “Rick” Singer, the owner of the Edge College & Career Network, to secure their children’s admissions into elite US universities. The scheme was revealed in March when federal prosecutors, after a year-long investigation dubbed “Operation Varsity Blues”, filed charges in what was called the Justice Department’s largest-ever college admissions criminal case.

Singer used several techniques, including what he called a “side door”, which often presented the children as sought-after athletes. In many cases, the students never participated in the sports. Singer admitted to taking pay-offs and is cooperating with prosecutors.

According to The Wall Street Journal and Los Angeles Times, which both cited unnamed sources familiar with the matter, the student who was admitted to Stanford, in Palo Alto, California, was connected to Singer via a contact at the global financial services firm, Morgan Stanley.

 

William “Rick” Singer (right) exiting federal court in Boston on March 12 after pleading guilty to charges in a nationwide college admissions bribery scandal. Photo: AP

The Journal does not name the student or family. The Times and Associated Press identify the student as Yusi “Molly” Zhao.

The Times said the Beijing-based family was introduced to Singer by a Morgan Stanley financial adviser to help get their daughter into the school. According to the newspaper’s unnamed sources, she was admitted to Stanford in the spring of 2017, with Singer putting her forth as a competitive sailor “despite there being no indication she competed in the sport”.

A Stanford student had his or her admission rescinded last month, a university spokesperson confirmed to the South China Morning Post on Wednesday. However, the university said on Wednesday that “in compliance with privacy laws, Stanford cannot identify or confirm … the student named in press reports”.

The Journal reported on Monday that a second Chinese family was put in contact with Singer via an Oppenheimer & Company employee, ultimately paying him US$1.2 million to secure a spot for a young woman at Yale University. The family was not an Oppenheimer client, The Journal said.

Neither Chinese family had been charged, the papers said.

A spokeswoman for Morgan Stanley said that Michael Wu, an adviser at the firm, had been terminated “for not cooperating with an internal investigation into the college admissions matter”.

“We are cooperating with the authorities.”

Prosecutors in the US Attorney’s office in Boston, Massachusetts, in March charged 33 parents of students admitted to prestigious schools with wrongdoing. “Athletic coaches from Yale, Stanford, USC, Wake Forest and Georgetown, among others, are implicated, as well as parents and exam administrators,” the office said at the time.

Stanford’s former sailing coach, John Vandemoer, pleaded guilty to charges of racketeering and also admitted to working with Singer to help get students admitted.

According to Stanford, a total of US$770,000 was contributed to the university’s sailing program in the form of three separate gifts via Singer’s sham charity, the Key Worldwide Foundation.

“The head sailing coach pleaded guilty to charges that he accepted financial contributions to the sailing programme from this foundation in exchange for agreeing to recommend two prospective students for admission to Stanford,” Stanford spokesman Ernest Miranda confirmed with the Post via email.

“Neither of these two students subsequently completed the application process; therefore, neither was admitted to Stanford nor enrolled at Stanford.”

A third student, which was not named in the government’s charges and received no recommendation from the sailing coach, was admitted to the school. Months after the student was admitted, a payment of US$500,000 was made to Stanford.

“Early last month, we completed our review of the third student. We determined that some of the material in the student’s application is false and, in accordance with our policies, rescinded admission. The student is no longer on Stanford’s campus,” Miranda added.

Yale University did not immediately respond to Post requests for comment.

“The investigation is ongoing,” Elizabeth McCarthy, public affairs specialist at the US Attorney’s office in Boston, told the Post, without adding further comment.

On March 12, when the indictments were announced by US Attorney for the District of Massachusetts Andrew Lelling, he said that the amount of money parents paid to Singer ranged from US$15,000 to a top end of US$6.5 million.

In all, 50 individuals were named as taking part in the scandal. The 33 parents came from a wide social range, from prominent financial services executives to the actresses Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman.

William “Bill” McGlashan, founder and managing partner of TPG Growth, a division of the powerhouse private equity firm, was fired as a result of his involvement in the scandal. Gordon Caplan, a co-chairman of the Willkie Farr & Gallagher international law firm, is no longer a partner there and faces disbarment since agreeing to plead guilty.

 

Source :

South China Morning Post

You may also like...

About us


Our Newly established Center for study of Asian Affairs has
branches in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore, as well as freelances in some other countries.

For inquires, please contact: newsofasia.info@yahoo.com Mr.Mohd Zarif - Secretary of the Center and administer of the web-site www.newsofasia.net

Polls

Which region news you interested in most?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...